📢 Gate Square #Creator Campaign Phase 1# is now live – support the launch of the PUMP token sale!
The viral Solana-based project Pump.Fun ($PUMP) is now live on Gate for public sale!
Join the Gate Square Creator Campaign, unleash your content power, and earn rewards!
📅 Campaign Period: July 11, 18:00 – July 15, 22:00 (UTC+8)
🎁 Total Prize Pool: $500 token rewards
✅ Event 1: Create & Post – Win Content Rewards
📅 Timeframe: July 12, 22:00 – July 15, 22:00 (UTC+8)
📌 How to Join:
Post original content about the PUMP project on Gate Square:
Minimum 100 words
Include hashtags: #Creator Campaign
Bitcoin's total supply limit of 21 million: advantages and challenges of an innovative currency mechanism
Discussing the Pros and Cons of Bitcoin's Supply Cap
The total supply of Bitcoin is limited to 21 million coins, a setting that has sparked discussions with differing viewpoints. Some believe this is an advantage of Bitcoin, as it can prevent inflation; others worry that it may become a fatal weakness for Bitcoin, leading to deflation issues. So, is this quantity limit a flaw or an advantage of Bitcoin?
First, it is necessary to clarify a common misconception: the actual circulation of Bitcoin is not limited to 21 million. In fact, Bitcoin can be infinitely subdivided, with its smallest unit "Satoshi" being one hundred millionth of a Bitcoin. From this perspective, the maximum quantity of Bitcoin is actually 21 trillion, not 21 million. This design provides ample room for potential value growth in the future.
Even in extreme circumstances, a circulation of 21 million cannot meet the transaction needs of humanity, and we need not worry excessively. Human creativity is infinite, just as we created Bitcoin, and in the future, other forms of digital currency may also be developed. Currently, there are many cryptocurrencies on the market, such as Litecoin and Ethereum, and this diversity itself is a strong supplement to the shortcomings of a single currency.
A key difference between Bitcoin and traditional fiat currencies lies in their issuance mechanisms. The creation of Bitcoin is a market-driven result, where miners are rewarded by providing computational power. In this process, miners incur costs, provide services, and increase liquidity, which is essentially no different from other productive activities. In contrast, the issuance of fiat currency is often subject to the decisions of central authorities.
Another important significance of setting a total supply limit is to shape scarcity expectations. Just as gold and artworks are highly valued for their finiteness, Bitcoin's fixed total supply gives people the expectation of its value continuing to grow. This stands in stark contrast to fiat currencies that can be issued infinitely, which often face ongoing depreciation pressure.
The monetary mechanism of Bitcoin can, to some extent, be seen as an innovative attempt. It ensures the limitation of the total supply while providing sufficient flexibility through divisibility. When Bitcoin appreciates, it can adapt to new value levels through more detailed segmentation, and this mechanism theoretically balances scarcity and utility well.
Humanity has been exploring the ideal monetary system, attempting to answer core questions such as how much currency society needs, who should receive newly created currency first, and who has the right to produce currency. The design of Bitcoin offers a completely new perspective on these issues. Although it remains controversial, it is undoubtedly an important exploration in the field of monetary theory and practice.