Within just two days, Solana attracted over $2 billion in significant investments from institutional investors managing multi-billion-dollar portfolios.

After its previous breakout during the meme coin frenzy, can SOL successfully emulate BTC and ETH in its latest move?

More publicly traded companies are adding SOL to their balance sheets. Solana’s market capitalization now totals $101.4 billion. According to The Block Dashboard, public companies currently hold 3.44 million SOL. At the time of writing, with SOL averaging $190 per token, these holdings are valued at roughly $650 million. Upexi alone holds more than 1.82 million SOL, worth approximately $350 million.

https://www.theblock.co/data/treasuries/solana-treasuries/stacked-sol-holdings-by-public-companies

Yet the capital landscape is rapidly changing. SOL held by listed companies accounts for only 0.69% of total circulating supply. In comparison, Pantera Capital’s $1.25 billion commitment over the past two days—along with a combined $1 billion infusion promised by Galaxy, Multicoin, and Jump—is equivalent to 3.5 times the total SOL holdings of all public companies combined.

Big Players Enter: A Quiet Battle for Capital

On August 25, Galaxy Digital, Multicoin Capital, and Jump Crypto announced a joint initiative to raise approximately $1 billion, specifically for accumulating Solana. The three crypto investment heavyweights are in talks with potential backers for this dedicated fund.

This isn’t just routine investing—it’s a coordinated strategic play. The trio has enlisted Cantor Fitzgerald LP, a storied Wall Street investment bank, as lead advisor, with plans to acquire an undisclosed public company and transform it into a digital asset finance firm dedicated to Solana.

The Solana Foundation has already signaled its support, and the parties expect to close the transaction in early September.

This move is part of a broader, long-term strategy—not a one-off event. Multicoin and Jump have already invested heavily in Solana ecosystem projects. Galaxy Trading previously raised about $620 million to purchase discounted SOL from FTX’s bankruptcy estate. Now, these firms are partnering to double down.

Just a day later (August 26), Pantera—led by ex-Tiger Management executive Dan Morehead—shared its own ambitions in a report by The Information: aiming to raise up to $1.25 billion to acquire a NASDAQ-listed company, refocus it as a Solana-centric investment firm, and rebrand it “Solana Co.”

Pantera has now clarified the fund’s true ambition: a full-scale bet on the Solana ecosystem.

Of note, Pantera isn’t just increasing its own exposure—it has teamed up with ParaFi Capital to support Sharps Technology, a firm developing financial tools for Solana that is itself raising over $400 million. This series of actions underscores Pantera’s conviction in Solana’s future.

Pantera’s strategy extends further, with discreet investments totaling around $300 million in Digital Asset Finance (DAT) firms across various tokens and regions. This approach not only generates returns but also boosts net asset value, reflecting an institutional-grade, risk-managed approach to crypto allocation.

Why Solana? The Institutional Capital Playbook

Smart investors thrive on finding opportunity where others see crisis. The pattern is clear: before Bitcoin and Ethereum treasury strategies became mainstream, both Pantera and Galaxy acquired heavily discounted SOL tokens from FTX’s bankruptcy estate—realizing significant profits in the process.

The first tranche was sold at $64 per token for 25–30 million tokens—more than 60% below market at the time. The next tranche was sold at $95–$110 per token, a 15–26% discount. Precise returns for Pantera and Galaxy remain undisclosed, but their current aggressive positioning signals that they’ve reaped meaningful gains.

The emergence of the Digital Asset Finance (DAT) company model gives institutional investors powerful new tools for value capture. Through this approach, they not only benefit from SOL’s potential appreciation but also secure steady yields via DeFi protocols, achieving multiple streams of asset growth.

Large-scale institutional entry will provide robust price support for SOL. History shows that systematic accumulation by institutions often ushers in a more stable, rising price channel for crypto assets.

Ethereum has already paved the way. Following the launch of ETFs and increased institutional participation, ETH’s price has climbed, volatility has declined, and market depth has improved. The 69 Ethereum treasury entities now collectively hold 4.1 million ETH—3.39% of the total circulating supply—with a position value near $2 billion. Ethereum recently hit a four-year high, thanks in part to these purchases.

Solana appears to be following this path, albeit at a much smaller scale compared to BTC and ETH. As more institutions accumulate SOL, its liquidity profile will shift. This may result in holdings that are more stable, but also more concentrated. Spot ETFs for BTC and ETH have been approved for over a year. Analysts now speculate that a spot SOL ETF could be approved this year.

Traditional financial institutions aren’t chasing Solana on a whim. Their interest is grounded in Solana’s unique technical strengths. Balancing blockchain’s three core challenges—decentralization, security, and scalability—Solana stands out with exceptional throughput and ultra-low transaction costs.

While Ethereum continues to battle high gas fees, Solana processes thousands of transactions per second at a negligible cost. For institutions familiar with the efficiency of traditional finance, Solana’s performance is a compelling advantage.

Equally important, Solana’s fast-growing landscape of dApps, NFTs, and DeFi protocols offers a broad array of real-world use cases and growth potential. This vibrant ecosystem is a core driver of institutional interest.

For developers and project teams building on Solana, this influx of capital opens the door to greater experimentation, innovation, and real-world deployment—initiating a new phase of ecosystem growth.

The successful rise of Digital Asset Finance companies may spur the emergence of more specialized investment vehicles. These models give institutions streamlined access to the crypto space and offer new pathways for bridging traditional finance with digital assets.

Over the next few years, expect to see a new generation of investment firms focused on specific blockchain ecosystems, reshaping the institutional landscape.

Risks: The Power Shift Dilemma

Few could have predicted, at Solana’s launch, how quickly it would become favored by Wall Street investors. From near extinction after FTX’s collapse to a preferred asset among Wall Street firms, Solana’s journey captures the unpredictability and magnetism of crypto.

This wave of institutional investment likely marks only the beginning. With leaders like Pantera and Galaxy setting the precedent, more traditional firms could follow and add Solana to their diversified holdings.

But concentrated institutional inflows bring risks as well. When a handful of institutions amass outsized SOL positions, they can inadvertently re-centralize what was designed as a decentralized asset—potentially undermining Solana’s decentralization. For example, while SOL treasury firm DeFi Dev Corp. continues to accumulate tokens, it also announced on Twitter its intention to vote “yes” on Solana’s Alpenglow proposal this week—a measure aimed at “speeding up” network voting. Faced with complex technical proposals, average users may follow the lead of large institutions, potentially allowing these firms to reshape Solana according to their preferences.

There’s also increased risk of price manipulation. Should these major holders decide to rebalance or exit, the market could experience severe volatility.

Disclaimer:

1. This article is reproduced from [Foresight News]. Copyright belongs to the original author [angelilu, Foresight News]. If you have concerns regarding this republication, please contact the Gate Learn team; we will address such matters promptly in accordance with established procedures.
2. Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not constitute any form of investment advice.
3. Other language versions of this article are translated by the Gate Learn team. Reproduction, distribution, or direct copying of the translated article is not permitted without clearly referencing Gate.